50 years of science, citizen activism and policy making on air pollution

da Schio: "Knowledge about air pollution is essential, both to challenge the status quo and to imagine a different urban reality. But science itself does not lead to change, and I say this as a scientist: everything depends on the way stakeholders appropriate and mobilize scientific knowledge. We also need to recognize other forms of knowledge, and be aware of their potential to make a problem visible and address it."

Citizens set the agenda

It is clear from the research that science is not the only form of "usable" knowledge.  Lay knowledge and public knowledge have always been essential in putting air pollution on the agenda.

da Schio: "Making a problem visible to a wider audience can in itself be transformative and put pressure on governments to respond."

The study finds that the use of scientific knowledge by social movements and civil society in particular plays a central role in challenging existing priorities or developing counter strategies, often alternating between lay knowledge and more formal scientific knowledge. At the same time, scientific knowledge is also used in perpetuating existing hierarchies.

da Schio: "The research helps us put current projects of research and civic engagement in a long-term perspective. What we see today withCurieuzenAir, for example,  is just the next step in a long trajectory, where citizens and movements appropriate an issue that is important to them, and try to push through the agenda for a more liveable Brussels."

The research

The study is based on the analysis of newspaper articles and documents kept in the archives of the IEB ( Inter-Environnement Bruxelles https://www.ieb.be).  The authors of the study examined three different cases of citizens' mobilization for cleaner air: a mobilization of the residents of the Bourdon neighborhood in Uccle in the late 1980s; the long mobilization against pollution from the incinerator in Neder-Over-Heembeek in the early 1990s, during which Greenpeace climbed the towers of the incinerator; and a lawsuit filed by BRAL and IEB in the summer of 2000 against the municipal, regional and national authorities for ozone related air pollution. The researchers reconstructed the events surrounding these three cases, analyzed the discourse in media sources and archival documents, and shed light on the themes, processes, and events related to air pollution and litigation. They made a detailed reconstruction of the events, focusing on the forms and qualities of scientific expertise mobilized by the different actors and on the strategies used.

contact:

Nicola da Schio

[email protected]

0485 75 62 27